BSCT vs. QCON
BSCT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCT is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCT vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCT vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.01% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCT vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCT
QCON
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BSCT
QCON
-
Financial Services
BSCT
QCON
Healthcare
BSCT
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCT
QCON
-
Communication Services
BSCT
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCT
QCON
Energy
BSCT
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCT
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCT
QCON
Real Estate
BSCT
QCON
-
Basic Materials
BSCT
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCT vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCT
QCON
BSCT vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCT vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | 0.00% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | 0.00% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCT vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCT | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 0.00% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 0.00% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 0.00% | +7.26% |
BSCT vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCT vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.53% | 4.51% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 0.86% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCT has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCT and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCT and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer