BSCT vs. FBDC
BSCT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. BSCT is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCT charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
BSCT vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCT achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -10.39% return.
BSCT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FBDC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCT vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.62% | 3.20% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -10.39% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCT and FBDC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCT vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
BSCT
FBDC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCT vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCT vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -20.60% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -18.04% | +17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -10.44% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCT vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCT | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28% | 18.00% | -15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 18.00% | -12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 18.00% | -10.76% |
BSCT vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCT vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than FBDC's 11.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.53% | 4.51% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 0.86% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.63% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCT and FBDC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.63%, compared with 4.58% for BSCT.
BSCT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCT and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for BSCT and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer