BSCR vs. QCON
BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCR is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCR vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.84% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCR vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCR
QCON
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
BSCR
QCON
Consumer Cyclical
BSCR
QCON
-
Healthcare
BSCR
QCON
-
Technology
BSCR
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCR
QCON
Consumer Defensive
BSCR
QCON
-
Communication Services
BSCR
QCON
-
Energy
BSCR
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCR
QCON
Real Estate
BSCR
QCON
-
Basic Materials
BSCR
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCR vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCR
QCON
BSCR vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCR | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCR | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCR vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCR | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | 0.00% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | 0.00% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCR vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCR | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08% | 0.00% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 0.00% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 0.00% | +5.35% |
BSCR vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCR vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCR and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCR and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer