PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCR vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCR vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.33% return.


BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*

HYGH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.56%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.56%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCR vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.37%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.33%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%11.09%-0.85%0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCR and HYGH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCR vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCR vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCRHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.10

1.40

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.21

4.80

+5.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.27

18.77

+25.50

BSCR vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCR Sharpe Ratio is 4.17, which is higher than the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCR and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCR vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCRHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-23.88%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-1.62%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-8.06%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-8.24%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.08%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-2.22%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.41%

-0.31%

Volatility

BSCR vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is 0.23%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that BSCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCRHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

0.63%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.61%

2.81%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03%

3.64%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.08%

7.08%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

8.30%

-2.97%

BSCR vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCR vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than HYGH's 6.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.60%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCR and HYGH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGH has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to BSCR (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

On 5-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.91% vs 1.44% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.91% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

BSCR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while HYGH tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCR and 0.52% for HYGH.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCR and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer