PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCR vs. BSCQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.


BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*

BSCQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
1.55%5.02%4.86%5.71%-8.31%-1.68%9.41%13.94%-2.40%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCR and BSCQ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between BSCR and BSCQ has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCR
BSCQ

Financial Services

20.9%
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
6.1%

Healthcare

10.4%
7.4%

Technology

10.1%
10.8%

Industrials

6.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
1.5%

Energy

3.9%
3.0%

Utilities

3.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

0.9%
0.5%

Financial Services

BSCR
20.9%
BSCQ
32.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCR
12.1%
BSCQ
6.1%

Healthcare

BSCR
10.4%
BSCQ
7.4%

Technology

BSCR
10.1%
BSCQ
10.8%

Industrials

BSCR
6.6%
BSCQ
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSCR
5.1%
BSCQ
3.9%

Communication Services

BSCR
4.0%
BSCQ
1.5%

Energy

BSCR
3.9%
BSCQ
3.0%

Utilities

BSCR
3.3%
BSCQ
3.5%

Real Estate

BSCR
3.0%
BSCQ
2.9%

Basic Materials

BSCR
0.9%
BSCQ
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCR vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCQ
BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCRBSCQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.10

3.43

-1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.69

42.97

-32.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.31

178.56

-132.24

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCR Sharpe Ratio is 4.20, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCR and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCRBSCQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20

7.01

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.45

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Drawdowns

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, roughly equal to the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and BSCQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCRBSCQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-16.50%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-0.10%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-1.13%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-13.02%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-2.85%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.02%

+0.08%

Volatility

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that BSCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCRBSCQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.17%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

0.43%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07%

0.63%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

3.30%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

4.77%

+0.58%

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSCR and BSCQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCR vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.12%4.14%4.05%3.53%2.54%1.91%2.42%2.96%3.32%2.92%0.51%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCR and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCR has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

On 5-year performance, BSCQ leads with 1.47% vs 1.41% for BSCR. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR and BSCQ have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

BSCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.

BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index.

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.01 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCR and BSCQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer