BSCQ vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCQ returned 1.47%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.68%	1.50%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCQ and QQQM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between BSCQ and QQQM has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCQ	QQQM
Financial Services	32.7%	0.2%
Technology	10.8%	53.8%
Healthcare	7.4%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	12.3%
Industrials	6.0%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	7.7%
Utilities	3.5%	1.4%
Energy	3.0%	0.6%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.1%
Communication Services	1.5%	15.8%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.1%

Return for Risk

BSCQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCQ	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.06	2.65	+4.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	15.22	3.46	+11.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.45	1.45	+1.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	43.24	3.53	+39.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	179.65	13.52	+166.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCQ Sharpe Ratio is 7.06, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCQ and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCQ	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06	2.65	+4.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.82	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.85	-0.24

Drawdowns

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCQ	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-35.04%	+18.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-11.96%	+11.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.13%	-22.70%	+21.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.02%	-35.04%	+22.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-8.25%	+5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	3.11%	-3.09%

Volatility

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) is 0.17%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that BSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCQ	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.17%	4.48%	-4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.43%	12.05%	-11.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63%	15.91%	-15.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	22.24%	-18.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	22.12%	-17.35%

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCQ and QQQM in my portfolio?

BSCQ and QQQM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCQ or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCQ dropped -16.50% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, BSCQ or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 1.47% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCQ or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCQ or QQQM?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCQ or QQQM?

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between BSCQ and QQQM?

BSCQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCQ and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.