BSCQ vs. MIG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG).
BSCQ and MIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. MIG is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Moody's Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index (TR Gross) (MVCI). It was launched on Dec 1, 2020. Both BSCQ and MIG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCQ vs. MIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCQ vs. MIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 0.63% |
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | -0.30% | 7.34% | 3.38% | 8.88% | -14.51% | -0.02% | 1.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than MIG's -0.30% return.
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
MIG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCQ vs. MIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MIG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. MIG — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
MIG
BSCQ vs. MIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | MIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.39 | 0.95 | +4.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.14 | 1.32 | +7.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.82 | 1.18 | +1.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.98 | 1.77 | +9.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.48 | 5.18 | +68.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | MIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39 | 0.95 | +4.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.18 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.13 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCQ and MIG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. MIG - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than MIG's 4.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
MIG VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.81% | 4.68% | 4.38% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. MIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum MIG drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and MIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | MIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -20.98% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | -2.83% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -20.98% | +7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.92% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -6.99% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.97% | -0.91% |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. MIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) is 0.22%, while VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that BSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | MIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 2.03% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.45% | 2.99% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 5.08% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 6.34% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 6.27% | -1.46% |