BSCQ vs. LQDH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH).
BSCQ and LQDH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014.
Performance
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.74% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 9.41% | 13.94% | -2.40% | 5.93% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.20% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 0.22% return.
BSCQ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
LQDH
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.25 | 1.66 | +3.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.88 | 2.41 | +6.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.74 | 1.37 | +1.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.85 | 1.76 | +9.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 72.51 | 8.91 | +63.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25 | 1.66 | +3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.08 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCQ and LQDH is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than LQDH's 6.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 6.10% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and LQDH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -24.63% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | -3.85% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -7.08% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.73% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -1.70% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.76% | -0.70% |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) is 0.22%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that BSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 1.54% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.45% | 2.25% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 4.11% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.32% | 4.43% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 6.45% | -1.64% |