BSCQ vs. FLRN
BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index while FLRN tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCQ returned 1.47%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLRN.
Performance
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCQ achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 1.87% return.
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FLRN
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 9.41% | 13.94% | -2.40% | 5.93% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.87% | 5.01% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.31% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 4.02% | 1.39% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCQ and FLRN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
FLRN
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.45 | 3.44 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.24 | 21.54 | +21.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 179.65 | 130.06 | +49.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06 | 7.18 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 2.50 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than FLRN's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and FLRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -14.64% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.23% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.13% | -1.43% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | -2.16% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -1.83% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.04% | -0.02% |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) has a higher volatility of 0.17% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that BSCQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 0.15% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.52% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.68% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 1.69% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 4.20% | +0.57% |
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than FLRN's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.51% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCQ and FLRN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCQ has higher volatility (0.17%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCQ dropped -16.50% vs FLRN's -14.64%.
On 5-year performance, FLRN leads with 4.19% vs 1.47% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRN.
FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.
BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCQ and 0.15% for FLRN.
FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 7.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCQ and FLRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer