PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCP vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCP vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
0.67%
1M
2.25%
YTD
2.74%
6M
1.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCP vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCP and PCL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCP vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCP vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCP vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCPPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

Volatility

BSCP vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCPPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.85%

BSCP vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCP vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than PCL's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
PCL
PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF
5.24%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCP and PCL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCP and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer