PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCMX vs. VSFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 21.62% return, which is significantly higher than VSFAX's 17.83% return.


BSCMX

1D
0.41%
1M
1.68%
6M
15.29%
YTD
21.62%
1Y
39.72%
3Y*
26.89%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*

VSFAX

1D
0.75%
1M
2.06%
6M
14.38%
YTD
17.83%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
21.62%23.51%24.77%22.75%-7.89%27.61%20.38%12.82%-12.23%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
17.83%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-19.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCMX and VSFAX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between BSCMX and VSFAX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCMX vs. VSFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCMX
BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCMXVSFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.64

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.87

8.77

+5.10

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the VSFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCMX and VSFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, smaller than the maximum VSFAX drawdown of -78.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and VSFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCMXVSFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.12%

-78.14%

+40.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.67%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.34%

-30.07%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-30.07%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.56%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-20.78%

+14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.90%

-0.09%

Volatility

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Volatility Comparison

Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) at 4.18%. This indicates that BSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCMXVSFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.18%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

12.22%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

17.93%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

23.25%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

24.00%

-3.45%

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than VSFAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCMX vs. VSFAX - Dividend Comparison

BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than VSFAX's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCMX
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund
3.82%4.54%2.31%3.50%2.93%4.38%1.76%1.11%9.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
2.93%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCMX and VSFAX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCMX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to VSFAX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCMX dropped -38.12% vs VSFAX's -78.14%.

BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCMX and VSFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer