BSCMX vs. HWSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX).
BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018. HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985.
Performance
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 6.39% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -16.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than HWSIX's 7.19% return.
BSCMX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCMX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCMX
HWSIX
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCMX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.73 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 1.16 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.92 | +1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 3.44 | +7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCMX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.73 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.43 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.44 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCMX and HWSIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison
BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than HWSIX's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 4.27% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
Drawdowns
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and HWSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCMX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -72.00% | +33.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.85% | -16.44% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -26.92% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -2.75% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -12.12% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.42% | -1.10% |
Volatility
BSCMX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 4.15%. This indicates that BSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCMX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 4.15% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 12.90% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 23.97% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 21.70% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 24.67% | -3.98% |