BSCFX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCFX (Baron Small Cap Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - BSCFX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc., while MCSFX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, BSCFX returned 1.04%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for MCSFX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCFX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCFX achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than MCSFX's 23.89% return.

BSCFX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: -2.17%
• 1Y: -0.10%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 1.04%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

MCSFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 23.89%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 38.04%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund	-1.94%	-0.92%	13.11%	26.90%	-31.19%	15.42%	40.38%	10.17%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	23.89%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCFX and MCSFX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.17

The correlation between BSCFX and MCSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSCFX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCFX

BSCFX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BSCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BSCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BSCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BSCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BSCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCFX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	2.60	-2.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	3.26	-3.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.47	-0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	4.87	-4.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.23	15.48	-15.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCFX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCFX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	2.60	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.31	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.33	+0.09

Drawdowns

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCFX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-37.16%	-18.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	-8.19%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.91%	-9.60%	-17.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.94%	-37.16%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.02%	-3.46%	-7.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.08%	-18.29%	+7.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	2.58%	+3.05%

Volatility

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) is 4.22%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that BSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCFX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	4.71%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	13.75%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.67%	15.90%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.33%	34.15%	-11.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	29.58%	-7.21%

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCFX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, less than MCSFX's 12.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund	9.69%	9.50%	13.96%	3.04%	5.90%	12.47%	11.17%	9.60%	10.91%	13.57%	22.41%	12.56%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	12.14%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCFX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

BSCFX and MCSFX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCFX or MCSFX?

MCSFX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BSCFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCFX dropped -55.59% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.