BSCFX vs. AAPL
BSCFX (Baron Small Cap Fund) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc., while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BSCFX returned 10.32%/yr vs 30.33%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCFX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BSCFX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 10.32%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.33% annualized return.
BSCFX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
AAPL
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 56.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 21.22%
- 10Y*
- 30.33%
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | -0.91% | -0.92% | 13.11% | 26.90% | -31.19% | 15.42% | 40.38% | 34.60% | -7.39% | 27.34% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 16.16% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCFX and AAPL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1997 | 0.47 |
The correlation between BSCFX and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCFX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
BSCFX
AAPL
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCFX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 2.57 | -2.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 3.56 | -3.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.46 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 4.17 | -4.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 10.52 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCFX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.57 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.78 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.05 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCFX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -81.80% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -13.80% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.91% | -33.36% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.94% | -33.36% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -38.52% | -1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | 0.00% | -10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -29.61% | +18.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | 5.47% | +0.15% |
Volatility
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) is 4.07%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that BSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCFX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.32% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 15.89% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 22.25% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 27.46% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 28.89% | -6.52% |
Dividends
BSCFX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than AAPL's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.33% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
BSCFX Baron Small Cap Fund | 9.59% | 9.50% | 13.96% | 3.04% | 5.90% | 12.47% | 11.17% | 9.60% | 10.91% | 13.57% | 22.41% | 12.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCFX and AAPL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BSCFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCFX dropped -55.59% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCFX and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer