PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCFX vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCFX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BSCFX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 10.32%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.33% annualized return.


BSCFX

1D
1.42%
1M
3.64%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
10.32%

AAPL

1D
2.90%
1M
12.62%
YTD
16.16%
6M
10.34%
1Y
56.89%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
21.22%
10Y*
30.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCFX
Baron Small Cap Fund
-0.91%-0.92%13.11%26.90%-31.19%15.42%40.38%34.60%-7.39%27.34%
AAPL
Apple Inc
16.16%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCFX and AAPL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1997

0.47

The correlation between BSCFX and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCFX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCFX
BSCFX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BSCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCFXAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

2.57

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

3.56

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.46

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

4.17

-4.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.46

10.52

-10.06

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCFX and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCFXAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.57

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.78

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.05

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Drawdowns

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCFX drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCFX and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCFXAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-81.80%

+26.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-13.80%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.91%

-33.36%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.94%

-33.36%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.58%

-38.52%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.09%

0.00%

-10.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-29.61%

+18.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

5.47%

+0.15%

Volatility

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baron Small Cap Fund (BSCFX) is 4.07%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that BSCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCFXAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

5.32%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

15.89%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

22.25%

-4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.32%

27.46%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

28.89%

-6.52%

Dividends

BSCFX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

BSCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than AAPL's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.33%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
BSCFX
Baron Small Cap Fund
9.59%9.50%13.96%3.04%5.90%12.47%11.17%9.60%10.91%13.57%22.41%12.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCFX and AAPL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BSCFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCFX dropped -55.59% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCFX and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer