PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 19.49% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 57.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BRZU has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -19.99%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.


BRZU

1D
0.96%
1M
10.98%
6M
7.54%
YTD
19.49%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
-19.99%
ALL TIME*
-30.13%

TNA

1D
4.26%
1M
0.01%
6M
31.11%
YTD
57.68%
1Y
100.85%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
-2.25%
10Y*
7.49%
ALL TIME*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
19.49%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
57.68%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and TNA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.43

The correlation between BRZU and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

BRZU vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRZU
TNA

Financial Services

34.5%
17.5%

Energy

15.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

14.5%
4.4%

Utilities

13.5%
2.7%

Industrials

11.6%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.6%

Healthcare

2.2%
20.3%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
9.2%

Technology

0.4%
14.8%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Financial Services

BRZU
34.5%
TNA
17.5%

Energy

BRZU
15.1%
TNA
5.5%

Basic Materials

BRZU
14.5%
TNA
4.4%

Utilities

BRZU
13.5%
TNA
2.7%

Industrials

BRZU
11.6%
TNA
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

BRZU
4.7%
TNA
2.6%

Healthcare

BRZU
2.2%
TNA
20.3%

Communication Services

BRZU
2.1%
TNA
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BRZU
1.4%
TNA
9.2%

Technology

BRZU
0.4%
TNA
14.8%

Real Estate

BRZU

-

TNA
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRZUTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.12

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

10.19

-5.55

BRZU vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than TNA's maximum drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-88.09%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.97%

-32.53%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-65.78%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.89%

-82.36%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

-88.09%

-10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.14%

-33.31%

-65.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.62%

-33.92%

-55.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.80%

9.94%

+4.86%

Volatility

BRZU vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 10.13%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.19%

10.13%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.80%

42.46%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.55%

57.79%

-8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.16%

67.23%

-12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.28%

68.34%

+13.94%

BRZU vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than TNA's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
1.89%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.29%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and TNA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (11.19%) compared to TNA (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 7.49% vs -19.99% for BRZU. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 10.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 7.49% return vs -19.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TNA is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.29% for TNA.

BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer