BRZU vs. BLSG
BRZU (Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares) and BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BRZU is passively managed, while BLSG is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRZU charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLSG.
Performance
BRZU vs. BLSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than BLSG's -58.79% return.
BRZU
- 1D
- -6.46%
- 1M
- -22.26%
- YTD
- 11.76%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 55.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- -4.04%
- 10Y*
- -16.20%
BLSG
- 1D
- -15.77%
- 1M
- -55.27%
- YTD
- -58.79%
- 6M
- -73.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRZU vs. BLSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares | 11.76% | 12.30% |
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -58.79% | -60.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRZU and BLSG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRZU vs. BLSG — Risk / Return Rank
BRZU
BLSG
BRZU vs. BLSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRZU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRZU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -0.66 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
BRZU vs. BLSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than BLSG's maximum drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and BLSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRZU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.71% | -83.67% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.20% | -83.52% | -15.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.55% | -60.12% | -29.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BRZU vs. BLSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRZU | BLSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.58% | 145.44% | -95.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.40% | 145.44% | -90.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.15% | 145.44% | -62.29% |
BRZU vs. BLSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BLSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRZU vs. BLSG - Dividend Comparison
BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BRZU Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares | 2.39% | 2.39% | 8.73% | 3.24% | 4.70% | 6.29% | 0.78% | 0.95% | 1.04% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRZU and BLSG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.
BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 0.75% for BLSG.
Find the right allocation for BRZU and BLSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer