BRWIX vs. MCGFX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BRWIX (AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund) and MCGFX (AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from AMG. Over the past 10 years, BRWIX returned 11.15%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for MCGFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRWIX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for MCGFX.

Performance

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) and AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRWIX achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than MCGFX's 17.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRWIX having a 11.15% annualized return and MCGFX not far behind at 11.12%.

BRWIX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 27.86%
• 3Y*: 13.59%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

MCGFX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 6M: 13.94%
• 1Y: -11.51%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRWIX AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund	12.33%	21.16%	3.08%	13.75%	-25.35%	12.38%	29.77%	27.98%	-3.67%	23.65%
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	17.27%	-19.12%	14.37%	34.16%	-27.05%	25.78%	31.91%	32.61%	-1.47%	23.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BRWIX and MCGFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 1996	0.82

The correlation between BRWIX and MCGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BRWIX vs. MCGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRWIX

BRWIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
BRWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BRWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BRWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BRWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BRWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

MCGFX

MCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) and AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRWIX	MCGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	-0.31	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	-0.12	+2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.97	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	-0.31	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	-0.55	+11.34

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the MCGFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRWIX and MCGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRWIX drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, which is greater than MCGFX's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRWIX and MCGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRWIX	MCGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.49%	-45.56%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-35.89%	+24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.82%	-35.89%	+15.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.71%	-35.89%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.71%	-35.89%	-0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.43%	-20.48%	+17.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.57%	-10.69%	-6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	20.24%	-17.66%

Volatility

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) and AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund (MCGFX) have volatilities of 6.87% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRWIX	MCGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	7.06%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.10%	15.11%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.48%	36.45%	-20.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	25.31%	-6.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.21%	22.51%	-2.30%

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRWIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MCGFX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRWIX vs. MCGFX - Dividend Comparison

BRWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while MCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRWIX AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund	0.67%	0.75%	1.17%	0.63%	0.48%	45.72%	14.71%	10.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCGFX AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.27%	3.66%	10.96%	78.35%	16.87%	9.08%	25.33%	9.88%	11.33%	33.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRWIX and MCGFX in my portfolio?

BRWIX and MCGFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRWIX or MCGFX?

MCGFX has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to BRWIX (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRWIX dropped -54.49% vs MCGFX's -45.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.