PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRW vs. NSTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRW vs. NSTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than NSTLX's 0.76% return.


BRW

1D
0.14%
1M
2.44%
YTD
5.04%
6M
3.48%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
10Y*

NSTLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
4.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRW vs. NSTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
5.04%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
0.76%9.44%6.02%10.07%-11.81%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BRW and NSTLX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021

0.22

The correlation between BRW and NSTLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRW vs. NSTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NSTLX
NSTLX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
NSTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NSTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRW vs. NSTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRWNSTLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

1.90

-1.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

2.96

-2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

2.09

-1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.47

7.61

-7.14

BRW vs. NSTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the NSTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRW and NSTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRWNSTLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

1.90

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.87

-0.26

Drawdowns

BRW vs. NSTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum NSTLX drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and NSTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRWNSTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-19.00%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

-3.30%

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-4.85%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-16.65%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-0.86%

-6.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-2.70%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.84%

0.90%

+8.94%

Volatility

BRW vs. NSTLX - Volatility Comparison

Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) at 1.42%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRWNSTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

1.42%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

2.90%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

3.62%

+9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

5.06%

+7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.85%

4.99%

+7.86%

BRW vs. NSTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRW has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than NSTLX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRW vs. NSTLX - Dividend Comparison

BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.72%, more than NSTLX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
14.72%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
5.54%5.46%5.31%5.38%3.92%6.29%3.81%4.02%4.33%3.64%3.54%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRW and NSTLX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to NSTLX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs NSTLX's -19.00%.

NSTLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRW and NSTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer