PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRW vs. ADVNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRW vs. ADVNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and North Square Strategic Income Fund (ADVNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than ADVNX's 1.55% return.


BRW

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
-3.80%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*

ADVNX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.06%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRW vs. ADVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
0.06%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%
ADVNX
North Square Strategic Income Fund
1.55%11.20%9.71%5.07%-8.43%3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BRW and ADVNX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.13

The correlation between BRW and ADVNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRW vs. ADVNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ADVNX
ADVNX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ADVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRW vs. ADVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and North Square Strategic Income Fund (ADVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRWADVNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.65

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

7.40

-7.77

BRW vs. ADVNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ADVNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRW and ADVNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRW vs. ADVNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, which is greater than ADVNX's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and ADVNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRWADVNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-11.86%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

-2.57%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-5.22%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-11.86%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-1.20%

-10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-1.92%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.11%

0.92%

+9.19%

Volatility

BRW vs. ADVNX - Volatility Comparison

Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to North Square Strategic Income Fund (ADVNX) at 0.85%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRWADVNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

0.85%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

2.56%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

3.68%

+9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

4.24%

+8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.90%

3.76%

+9.14%

BRW vs. ADVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRW has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ADVNX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRW vs. ADVNX - Dividend Comparison

BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.66%, more than ADVNX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVNX
North Square Strategic Income Fund
4.84%4.73%4.02%4.38%2.80%5.23%6.80%3.33%3.92%4.09%4.19%6.30%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.66%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRW and ADVNX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to ADVNX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs ADVNX's -11.86%.

ADVNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRW and ADVNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer