BRUFX vs. FRGAX
BRUFX (Bruce Fund) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, BRUFX returned 10.70%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for FRGAX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRUFX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRUFX achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 8.73% return.
BRUFX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
FRGAX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRUFX Bruce Fund | 9.33% | 14.89% | 4.45% | -0.74% | 0.56% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 8.73% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRUFX and FRGAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between BRUFX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRUFX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
BRUFX
FRGAX
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bruce Fund (BRUFX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRUFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.13 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 14.01 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRUFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.43 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.52 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRUFX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUFX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRUFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -11.77% | -32.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -7.03% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.66% | -11.77% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -0.59% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -1.58% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.57% | +0.15% |
Volatility
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
Bruce Fund (BRUFX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 2.80%. This indicates that BRUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRUFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 2.80% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 7.22% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 9.05% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 10.31% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 10.31% | +1.29% |
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRUFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRUFX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
BRUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRUFX Bruce Fund | 5.81% | 6.35% | 5.01% | 6.46% | 13.31% | 9.25% | 5.83% | 2.03% | 2.49% | 4.11% | 6.26% | 4.63% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.84% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRUFX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRUFX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FRGAX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUFX dropped -44.50% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRUFX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer