BRTR vs. LCTD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD).

BRTR and LCTD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRTR is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021.

Performance

BRTR vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BRTR vs. LCTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF	-0.32%	8.11%	1.29%	0.43%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	2.78%	30.42%	3.14%	2.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRTR achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than LCTD's 2.78% return.

BRTR

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 4.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCTD

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 14.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRTR vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio.

BRTR

Blackrock Total Return ETF

LCTD

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF

Return for Risk

BRTR vs. LCTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRTR

BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 52
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 79
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRTR vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRTR	LCTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	1.51	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.10	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	2.41	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.89	9.04	-4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRTR vs. LCTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the LCTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRTR and LCTD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRTR	LCTD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	1.51	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.45	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between BRTR and LCTD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BRTR vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison

BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than LCTD's 3.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF	4.84%	4.86%	5.58%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.51%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%

Drawdowns

BRTR vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum LCTD drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and LCTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRTR	LCTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-29.82%	+24.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-10.92%	+7.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-6.46%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-6.91%	+5.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	2.91%	-1.94%

Volatility

BRTR vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) is 1.75%, while BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that BRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRTR	LCTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.75%	7.20%	-5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	11.09%	-8.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.28%	17.12%	-12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	16.03%	-11.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	16.03%	-11.28%