BRSM vs. QIDX
BRSM (MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while QIDX is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Indexperts. Both are actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRSM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.
Performance
BRSM vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BRSM
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QIDX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $230.40K | $287.28K | $868.97K | |
| $7.44K | $43.97K | $36.42K |
BRSM vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 2.26% |
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRSM and QIDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRSM vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank
BRSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QIDX
BRSM vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRSM | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRSM vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRSM drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum QIDX drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSM and QIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRSM | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -14.99% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -0.53% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -2.15% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
BRSM vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRSM | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 10.96% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 14.23% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 14.23% | +2.75% |
BRSM vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRSM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRSM vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison
BRSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 0.86% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRSM and QIDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRSM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRSM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.
QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for BRSM.
BRSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QIDX is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRSM and 0.50% for QIDX.
Find the right allocation for BRSM and QIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer