PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRSJX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRSJX achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 12.84% return.


BRSJX

1D
1.07%
1M
-1.33%
6M
10.30%
YTD
15.39%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
9.14%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

CSMDX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.03%
6M
6.76%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRSJX
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund
15.39%5.80%4.75%18.84%-18.40%28.88%2.09%26.23%-5.37%9.32%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.84%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BRSJX and CSMDX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.92

The correlation between BRSJX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRSJX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRSJX
BRSJX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRSJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSJX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRSJXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.57

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

4.87

+2.93

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRSJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRSJX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRSJX drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSJX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRSJXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.20%

-37.28%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-9.20%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.05%

-24.60%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.05%

-24.60%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-1.60%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-5.69%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.97%

+0.23%

Volatility

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund (BRSJX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 3.30%. This indicates that BRSJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRSJXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.30%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

10.17%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

14.40%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

18.12%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

19.07%

+3.95%

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRSJX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRSJX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

BRSJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than CSMDX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRSJX
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Equity Fund
5.81%6.71%7.66%0.78%4.18%12.97%0.67%1.83%6.23%3.01%0.36%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.78%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRSJX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRSJX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to CSMDX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRSJX dropped -45.20% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

BRSJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRSJX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer