BRRR vs. SCUS
BRRR (Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRRR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. BRRR is passively managed, while SCUS is actively managed. Over the past year, BRRR returned -39.82% vs 4.00% for SCUS. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BRRR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.
Performance
BRRR vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRRR achieves a -28.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 1.51% return.
BRRR
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -28.99%
- 6M
- -29.02%
- 1Y
- -39.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRRR vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRRR Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF | -28.99% | -6.50% | 58.10% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.51% | 4.51% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRRR and SCUS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRRR vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank
BRRR
SCUS
BRRR vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRRR | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 2.61 | -1.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 24.13 | -24.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 104.03 | -105.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRRR vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRRR drawdown since its inception was -52.09%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRRR and SCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRRR | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.09% | -0.17% | -51.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.09% | -0.17% | -51.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.48% | -0.06% | -50.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.87% | -0.02% | -16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.55% | 0.04% | +30.51% |
Volatility
BRRR vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison
Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) has a higher volatility of 13.19% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.22%. This indicates that BRRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRRR | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | 0.22% | +12.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.63% | 0.50% | +34.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.20% | 0.68% | +43.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 0.71% | +49.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.98% | 0.71% | +49.27% |
BRRR vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRRR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRRR vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison
BRRR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BRRR Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 3.91% | 4.17% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRRR and SCUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRRR has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to SCUS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRRR dropped -52.09% vs SCUS's -0.17%.
On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 4.00% vs -39.82% for BRRR. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 4.00% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BRRR.
SCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BRRR.
BRRR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie Digital Assets and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BRRR and 0.14% for SCUS.
SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRRR and SCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer