PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRRR vs. SCUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRRR vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRRR achieves a -28.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 1.51% return.


BRRR

1D
-3.30%
1M
-17.84%
YTD
-28.99%
6M
-29.02%
1Y
-39.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCUS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.61%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRRR vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BRRR
Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF
-28.99%-6.50%58.10%
SCUS
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.51%4.51%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BRRR and SCUS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRRR vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRRR
BRRR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRRR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRRR Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SCUS
SCUS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRRR vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRRRSCUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

2.61

-1.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

24.13

-24.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

104.03

-105.34

BRRR vs. SCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRRR Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the SCUS Sharpe Ratio of 5.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRRR and SCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRRR vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRRR drawdown since its inception was -52.09%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRRR and SCUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRRRSCUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.09%

-0.17%

-51.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.09%

-0.17%

-51.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.48%

-0.06%

-50.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-0.02%

-16.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.55%

0.04%

+30.51%

Volatility

BRRR vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) has a higher volatility of 13.19% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.22%. This indicates that BRRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRRRSCUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

0.22%

+12.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.63%

0.50%

+34.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.20%

0.68%

+43.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.98%

0.71%

+49.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.98%

0.71%

+49.27%

BRRR vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRRR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRRR vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison

BRRR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


PositionTTM20252024
BRRR
Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCUS
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
3.91%4.17%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRRR and SCUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRRR has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to SCUS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRRR dropped -52.09% vs SCUS's -0.17%.

On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 4.00% vs -39.82% for BRRR. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 4.00% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BRRR.

SCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BRRR.

BRRR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie Digital Assets and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BRRR and 0.14% for SCUS.

SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRRR and SCUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer