BRRR vs. BTCW
BRRR (CoinShares Bitcoin ETF) and BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BRRR tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while BTCW tracks the No Index (Physical Bitcoin). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BRRR returned -44.57% vs -44.53% for BTCW. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
BRRR vs. BTCW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BRRR having a -28.35% return and BTCW slightly higher at -28.33%.
BRRR
- 1D
- -2.90%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- -25.04%
- YTD
- -28.35%
- 1Y
- -44.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.37%
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- 6M
- -25.06%
- YTD
- -28.33%
- 1Y
- -44.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.03M | $1.49M | $3.69M | |
| $1.20M | $1.71M | $1.37M |
BRRR vs. BTCW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRRR CoinShares Bitcoin ETF | -28.35% | -6.50% | 87.59% |
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -28.33% | -6.05% | 92.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRRR and BTCW is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between BRRR and BTCW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRRR vs. BTCW — Risk / Return Rank
BRRR
BTCW
BRRR vs. BTCW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRRR | BTCW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.87 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.34 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRRR vs. BTCW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRRR drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCW drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRRR and BTCW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRRR | BTCW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.33% | -53.37% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.33% | -53.37% | +0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.03% | -50.05% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.26% | -18.19% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.63% | 34.63% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BRRR vs. BTCW - Volatility Comparison
CoinShares Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) have volatilities of 9.11% and 9.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRRR | BTCW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 9.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.76% | 33.66% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.35% | 44.25% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.36% | 49.47% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.36% | 49.47% | -0.11% |
BRRR vs. BTCW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BRRR and BTCW have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRRR vs. BTCW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRRR nor BTCW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BRRR and BTCW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BTCW has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to BRRR (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRRR dropped -53.33% vs BTCW's -53.37%.
On 1-year performance, BTCW leads with -44.53% vs -44.57% for BRRR. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCW has performed better with a -44.53% return vs -44.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BRRR and BTCW have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
BRRR and BTCW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BRRR tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BTCW tracks No Index (Physical Bitcoin). They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and WisdomTree.
BRRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRRR and BTCW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer