BRRR vs. ETHA
BRRR (Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BRRR tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while ETHA tracks the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BRRR returned -39.68% vs -32.65% for ETHA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
BRRR vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRRR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA's -40.30% return.
BRRR
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -22.23%
- YTD
- -27.58%
- 6M
- -31.46%
- 1Y
- -39.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -25.20%
- YTD
- -40.30%
- 6M
- -43.67%
- 1Y
- -32.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRRR vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRRR Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF | -27.58% | -6.50% | 42.36% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -40.30% | -11.31% | -3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRRR and ETHA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BRRR and ETHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRRR vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank
BRRR
ETHA
BRRR vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRRR | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.96 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | -0.52 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | -0.86 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRRR | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | -0.48 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.42 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
BRRR vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRRR drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRRR and ETHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRRR | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.49% | -64.02% | +14.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.49% | -63.41% | +13.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.49% | -63.41% | +13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -32.71% | +16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.58% | 37.94% | -9.36% |
Volatility
BRRR vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF (BRRR) is 9.13%, while iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that BRRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRRR | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 9.93% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.87% | 45.48% | -11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.64% | 68.51% | -24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.89% | 72.46% | -22.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.89% | 72.46% | -22.57% |
BRRR vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BRRR and ETHA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRRR vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRRR nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRRR and ETHA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHA has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to BRRR (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRRR dropped -49.49% vs ETHA's -64.02%.
On 1-year performance, ETHA leads with -32.65% vs -39.68% for BRRR. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, BRRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHA has performed better with a -32.65% return vs -39.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BRRR and ETHA have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
BRRR and ETHA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BRRR tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie Digital Assets and iShares.
ETHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRRR and ETHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer