BROL vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 9, 2026

BROL (Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BROL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

BROL vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BROL

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 3.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 24.76%
• YTD: 30.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BROL vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BROL Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF	2.10%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BROL and GARY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.73

Return for Risk

BROL vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BROL vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BROL drawdown since its inception was -4.67%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BROL and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BROL	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-10.28%	+5.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-5.11%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-1.81%	+0.39%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BROL	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	21.87%	-4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	21.87%	-4.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	21.87%	-4.92%

BROL vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BROL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

BROL vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

BROL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
BROL Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BROL and GARY in my portfolio?

BROL and GARY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BROL or GARY?

On fees, BROL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BROL or GARY?

BROL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BROL or GARY?

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for BROL.

What is the main difference between BROL and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BROL and 0.77% for GARY.