BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO
BRNT.L (WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - BRNT.L is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Brent Crude Subindex, while SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BRNT.L returned 12.92%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRNT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BRNT.L is traded in USD, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRNT.L achieves a 67.54% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BRNT.L has underperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 12.92%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
BRNT.L
- 1D
- -6.20%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- 67.54%
- 6M
- 70.28%
- 1Y
- 52.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 21.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -18.67%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 84.02%
- 3Y*
- 40.93%
- 5Y*
- 18.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRNT.L WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil | 67.54% | -6.34% | 7.45% | 1.08% | 35.10% | 66.26% | -33.22% | 32.37% | -13.97% | 12.40% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -5.39% | 144.05% | 20.41% | -0.28% | 3.15% | -12.98% | 47.38% | 13.97% | -9.93% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRNT.L and SVR-C.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2012 | 0.08 |
The correlation between BRNT.L and SVR-C.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BRNT.L
SVR-C.TO
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRNT.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.88 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 4.07 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRNT.L drawdown since its inception was -86.06%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNT.L and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRNT.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.06% | -67.24% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.66% | -45.37% | +26.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.88% | -45.37% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.44% | -45.37% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.92% | -45.37% | -26.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -41.91% | +25.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.87% | -39.98% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 20.87% | -10.68% |
Volatility
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) is 13.34%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that BRNT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRNT.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 15.49% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.75% | 56.54% | -18.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.73% | 58.18% | -15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.88% | 36.41% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.25% | 32.37% | +2.88% |
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRNT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRNT.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRNT.L nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRNT.L and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRNT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRNT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
BRNT.L is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. BRNT.L tracks Bloomberg Brent Crude Subindex, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BRNT.L and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for BRNT.L and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer