PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRMKX vs. SWMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BRMKX having a 12.81% return and SWMCX slightly lower at 12.72%.


BRMKX

1D
0.69%
1M
4.12%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.55%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.68%

SWMCX

1D
0.68%
1M
4.11%
YTD
12.72%
6M
12.56%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
12.81%10.48%15.28%17.30%-17.22%22.52%17.17%30.47%-9.09%0.39%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
12.72%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BRMKX and SWMCX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.99

The correlation between BRMKX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRMKX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRMKX
BRMKX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BRMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRMKXSWMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.87

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

11.01

+0.06

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRMKX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRMKXSWMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.74

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.52

+0.10

Drawdowns

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRMKX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMKX and SWMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRMKXSWMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-40.34%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.15%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-21.07%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-26.09%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-6.63%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.12%

-0.01%

Volatility

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRMKXSWMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.27%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.96%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

13.42%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

18.25%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

20.64%

-1.32%

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRMKX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRMKX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

BRMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than SWMCX's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRMKX
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund
5.28%5.92%6.43%3.02%3.67%4.07%2.86%3.95%3.87%19.24%2.11%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.89%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BRMKX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRMKX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to SWMCX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMKX dropped -40.20% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

BRMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRMKX and SWMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer