BRMKX vs. QCGDX
BRMKX (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund) and QCGDX (Quantified Common Ground Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BRMKX returned 8.16%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for QCGDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRMKX charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for QCGDX.
Performance
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRMKX achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 18.38% return.
BRMKX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
QCGDX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 18.38%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRMKX iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund | 12.49% | 10.48% | 15.28% | 17.30% | -17.22% | 22.52% | 17.17% | 0.36% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 18.38% | 1.02% | 9.87% | 14.74% | -12.23% | 32.19% | 14.65% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRMKX and QCGDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BRMKX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRMKX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank
BRMKX
QCGDX
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRMKX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 4.31 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.33 | 15.87 | -5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRMKX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.04 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRMKX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMKX and QCGDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRMKX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.20% | -22.37% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -5.55% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -16.10% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -20.18% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.11% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -6.13% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.51% | +0.60% |
Volatility
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund (BRMKX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRMKX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.49% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.12% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 11.73% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 14.75% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 16.45% | +2.86% |
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRMKX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRMKX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison
BRMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRMKX iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund | 5.29% | 5.92% | 6.43% | 3.02% | 3.67% | 4.07% | 2.86% | 3.95% | 3.87% | 19.24% | 2.11% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 0.59% | 0.69% | 4.42% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRMKX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCGDX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to BRMKX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMKX dropped -40.20% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.
QCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRMKX and QCGDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer