BRLN vs. BLCV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV).

BRLN and BLCV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRLN is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 4, 2022. BLCV is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on May 19, 2023.

Performance

BRLN vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BRLN vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	-0.73%	5.38%	7.49%	8.47%
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	-2.92%	19.96%	12.63%	15.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRLN achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than BLCV's -2.92% return.

BRLN

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCV

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -5.90%
• YTD: -2.92%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 12.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRLN vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BRLN and BLCV have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

BRLN

BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF

BLCV

Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

BRLN vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRLN

BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 63
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BLCV

BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 47
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRLN vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRLN	BLCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	0.83	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.23	+0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	4.76	+2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRLN vs. BLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the BLCV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRLN and BLCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRLN	BLCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	0.83	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	1.24	+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between BRLN and BLCV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BRLN vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

BRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than BLCV's 1.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	6.58%	6.50%	7.87%	9.06%	1.48%
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.40%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BRLN vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRLN drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum BLCV drawdown of -13.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLN and BLCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRLN	BLCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-13.44%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.32%	-11.18%	+7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-7.81%	+6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-2.06%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	2.87%	-2.20%

Volatility

BRLN vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) is 1.44%, while Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that BRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRLN	BLCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	4.74%	-3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	8.73%	-6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.94%	15.51%	-11.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	12.81%	-9.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	12.81%	-9.03%