BRLGX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
BRLGX is managed by American Beacon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLGX American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund | -11.48% | 16.31% | 24.13% | 31.38% | -25.39% | 22.04% | 34.57% | 30.27% | -6.18% | 27.19% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRLGX achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BRLGX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.43% annualized return.
BRLGX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -9.59%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRLGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRLGX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
BRLGX
FCGSX
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRLGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 1.40 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 2.02 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 2.25 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | 10.23 | -8.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRLGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.40 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.93 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.87 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRLGX and FCGSX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
BRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.42%, more than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLGX American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund | 11.42% | 10.11% | 14.74% | 0.76% | 17.14% | 19.83% | 10.72% | 10.33% | 10.87% | 4.20% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRLGX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRLGX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRLGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.32% | -38.77% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -13.10% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -38.77% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.79% | -38.77% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | -10.42% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -7.05% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 2.88% | +1.49% |
Volatility
BRLGX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Growth Fund (BRLGX) is 5.54%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that BRLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRLGX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.66% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 13.74% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 23.80% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 23.62% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 23.15% | -1.35% |