BRKW vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. BRKW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

BRKW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BRKW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: -2.21%
• YTD: -4.63%
• 1Y: 0.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	5.56%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKW and ACYS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	-0.15

Return for Risk

BRKW vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKW

BRKW Risk / Return Rank: 10
BRKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BRKW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKW	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	—	—

Drawdowns

BRKW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKW drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKW and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKW	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-0.63%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.67%	-0.10%	-7.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-0.14%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRKW	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	3.38%	+13.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	3.38%	+13.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	3.38%	+13.84%

BRKW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

BRKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.38%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF	25.38%	14.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKW and ACYS in my portfolio?

BRKW and ACYS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRKW or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKW or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKW or ACYS?

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.38%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between BRKW and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKW and 0.75% for ACYS.