PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRK-B vs. KLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRK-B achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -9.82% return.


BRK-B

1D
1.98%
1M
3.90%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
-0.12%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
13.19%

KLIP

1D
-2.22%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-9.82%
6M
-11.94%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.89%10.89%27.09%11.83%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
-9.82%16.92%3.37%10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BRK-B and KLIP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2023

0.16

The correlation between BRK-B and KLIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRK-B vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRK-BKLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.18

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-0.42

+0.39

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRK-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRK-B and KLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRK-BKLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

-0.18

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRK-B drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-B and KLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRK-BKLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.86%

-18.61%

-35.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-15.97%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-18.61%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.57%

-15.00%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-3.81%

-7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

6.82%

-2.35%

Volatility

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) is 4.08%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that BRK-B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRK-BKLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.86%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

13.00%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

15.96%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

18.15%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

18.15%

+1.28%

Dividends

BRK-B vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.76%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
28.76%25.14%54.26%61.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRK-B and KLIP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KLIP has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to BRK-B (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-B dropped -53.86% vs KLIP's -18.61%.

BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRK-B and KLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer