BRK-A vs. MUU
BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock, while MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Over the past year, BRK-A returned -2.63% vs 5396.82% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BRK-A vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRK-A achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.
BRK-A
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
MUU
- 1D
- -15.35%
- 1M
- 121.05%
- YTD
- 798.37%
- 6M
- 1,279.44%
- 1Y
- 5,396.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-A vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.82% | 10.85% | -0.23% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 798.37% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRK-A and MUU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.04 |
The correlation between BRK-A and MUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRK-A vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
BRK-A
MUU
BRK-A vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRK-A | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -41.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.86 | -0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 104.05 | -104.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 352.22 | -352.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRK-A | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 41.32 | -41.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 5.91 | -5.08 |
Drawdowns
BRK-A vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRK-A drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-A and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRK-A | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -75.07% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -52.72% | +43.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.23% | -15.35% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -23.42% | +13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 15.54% | -11.15% |
Volatility
BRK-A vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) is 3.58%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 56.84%. This indicates that BRK-A experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRK-A | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 56.84% | -53.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 106.70% | -96.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 132.77% | -118.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 134.14% | -116.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 134.14% | -115.17% |
Dividends
BRK-A vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
BRK-A has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.54% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRK-A and MUU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to BRK-A (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-A dropped -51.47% vs MUU's -75.07%.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRK-A and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer