BRIE vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BRIE (MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BRIE is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRIE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

BRIE vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF (BRIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRIE achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.32% return.

BRIE

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 6M: 16.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRIE vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRIE MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF	13.85%	6.63%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BRIE and UMMA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

BRIE vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRIE vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF (BRIE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRIE	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.14	0.58	+1.57

Drawdowns

BRIE vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRIE drawdown since its inception was -11.39%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIE and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRIE	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.39%	-34.17%	+22.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.90%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-9.81%	+7.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRIE	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	20.11%	-2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	20.55%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	20.55%	-3.08%

BRIE vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRIE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRIE vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

BRIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than UMMA's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRIE MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRIE and UMMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BRIE and UMMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BRIE or UMMA?

On fees, BRIE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRIE or UMMA?

BRIE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRIE or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.24% for BRIE.

What is the main difference between BRIE and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BRIE and 0.65% for UMMA.