BRGIX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BRGIX (Bridges Investment Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BRGIX returned 14.36%/yr vs 24.90%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRGIX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRGIX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BRGIX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 14.36%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.90% annualized return.

BRGIX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 14.36%

FCGSX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 56.23%
• 3Y*: 33.30%
• 5Y*: 18.80%
• 10Y*: 24.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRGIX Bridges Investment Fund	1.40%	10.86%	27.84%	38.93%	-28.77%	25.81%	26.48%	32.17%	-3.78%	21.97%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	23.73%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BRGIX and FCGSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.90

The correlation between BRGIX and FCGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BRGIX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRGIX

BRGIX Risk / Return Rank: 12
BRGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BRGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BRGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BRGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BRGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRGIX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	2.95	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	3.66	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.49	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	5.34	-4.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	23.29	-20.07

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRGIX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRGIX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGIX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRGIX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.58%	-38.77%	-17.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-10.42%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.79%	-26.07%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.57%	-38.77%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.52%	-38.77%	+4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-0.62%	-2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.48%	-6.95%	-5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	2.38%	+1.69%

Volatility

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridges Investment Fund (BRGIX) is 4.77%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that BRGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRGIX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	7.55%	-2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	14.82%	-3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	18.83%	-5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.81%	23.83%	-4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	23.33%	-3.19%

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRGIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRGIX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

BRGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than FCGSX's 8.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRGIX Bridges Investment Fund	10.96%	11.12%	10.41%	3.50%	7.19%	6.81%	3.90%	3.73%	1.65%	3.83%	1.34%	1.63%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.47%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRGIX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

BRGIX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRGIX or FCGSX?

FCGSX has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to BRGIX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGIX dropped -56.58% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.