BRES vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

BRES (Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRES charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BRES vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF (BRES) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BRES

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 2.95%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: 12.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	$33.67K	$253.16K	$187.48K
BRES Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF	$629.01K	$455.54K	$576.72K

BRES vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BRES Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF	7.39%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BRES and BDGS is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2026	0.74

Return for Risk

BRES vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 61
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRES vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF (BRES) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRES	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.15	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.36	—

Drawdowns

BRES vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRES drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRES and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRES	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-9.12%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-2.94%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-0.68%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRES	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.72%	6.52%	+9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	8.18%	+7.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	8.18%	+7.54%

BRES vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRES has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRES vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
BRES Burney U.S. Equity Select ETF	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRES and BDGS in my portfolio?

BRES and BDGS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRES or BDGS?

On fees, BRES is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRES or BDGS?

BRES is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRES or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.16% for BRES.

What is the main difference between BRES and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Burney and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BRES and 0.87% for BDGS.