PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BREM vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BREM vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BREM achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly higher than GGOV's 2.16% return.


BREM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.36%
6M
4.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGOV

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
2.16%
6M
-1.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BREM vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BREM and GGOV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BREM vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF (BREM) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BREM vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BREMGGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

-0.14

+1.92

Drawdowns

BREM vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BREM drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, roughly equal to the maximum GGOV drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BREM and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BREMGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-4.69%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.64%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-1.59%

+0.93%

Volatility

BREM vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BREMGGOVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

5.37%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

5.37%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

5.37%

+0.32%

BREM vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BREM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BREM vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

BREM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BREM and GGOV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGOV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGOV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BREM.

BREM has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

BREM is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BREM and 0.39% for GGOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BREM and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer