BRCE vs. EQL
BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BRCE is actively managed, while EQL is passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.
Performance
BRCE vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 10.71% return.
BRCE
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EQL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 18.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.38K | $9.51K | $34.09K | |
| $3.33M | $2.84M | $2.70M |
BRCE vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 14.35% | 2.04% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 10.71% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCE and EQL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCE vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
BRCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EQL
BRCE vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRCE | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRCE vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and EQL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCE | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -35.65% | +26.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.27% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -3.23% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility
BRCE vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCE | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 9.50% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 14.51% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 16.49% | -2.30% |
BRCE vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRCE vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than EQL's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 0.51% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.35% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRCE and EQL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRCE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRCE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.51% for BRCE.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.27% for EQL.
Find the right allocation for BRCE and EQL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer