BRC vs. FVRR
BRC (Brady Corporation) and FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) are both stocks. BRC operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while FVRR operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, BRC returned 13.29%/yr vs -48.60%/yr for FVRR. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BRC vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRC achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly higher than FVRR's -54.81% return.
BRC
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 35.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.04%
FVRR
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -18.15%
- 6M
- -46.69%
- YTD
- -54.81%
- 1Y
- -59.56%
- 3Y*
- -32.86%
- 5Y*
- -48.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.89M | $16.02M | $28.09M | |
| $11.18M | $8.33M | $8.87M |
BRC vs. FVRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 21.34% | 7.60% | 27.69% | 26.91% | -10.91% | 3.75% | -6.00% | 19.86% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -54.81% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -41.72% | 730.21% | -9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRC and FVRR is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.18 |
The correlation between BRC and FVRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BRC:
$4.44B
FVRR:
$321.04M
BRC:
$4.39
FVRR:
$0.82
BRC:
21.47
FVRR:
10.93
BRC:
1.69
FVRR:
0.05
BRC:
2.78
FVRR:
0.78
BRC:
3.35
FVRR:
0.75
BRC:
$1.62B
FVRR:
$418.35M
BRC:
$828.93M
FVRR:
$343.03M
BRC:
$300.10M
FVRR:
$67.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRC vs. FVRR — Risk / Return Rank
BRC
FVRR
BRC vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brady Corporation (BRC) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRC | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.78 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | -0.90 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | -1.36 | +5.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRC vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRC drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, smaller than the maximum FVRR drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRC and FVRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRC | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -97.24% | +31.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.12% | -66.52% | +40.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -74.81% | +48.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -96.18% | +70.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -97.24% | +93.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -68.21% | +53.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.83% | 43.69% | -34.86% |
Volatility
BRC vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brady Corporation (BRC) is 6.12%, while Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a volatility of 26.74%. This indicates that BRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRC | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 26.74% | -20.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.81% | 47.39% | -17.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.68% | 54.13% | -20.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 64.83% | -38.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 71.15% | -43.10% |
Dividends
BRC vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison
BRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRC Brady Corporation | 1.04% | 1.23% | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.92% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.49% | 1.92% | 2.17% | 2.16% | 3.49% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BRC vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brady Corporation and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BRC vs. FVRR - Profitability Comparison
BRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brady Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.47M and revenue of 435.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
FVRR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 79.93M and revenue of 97.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.
BRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brady Corporation reported an operating income of 73.21M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
FVRR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
BRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Brady Corporation reported a net income of 57.80M and revenue of 435.24M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
FVRR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 4.47M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRC and FVRR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (26.74%) compared to BRC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRC dropped -65.62% vs FVRR's -97.24%.
BRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRC and FVRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer