PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRAGX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 Fund (BRAGX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRAGX achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BRAGX has underperformed GTSGX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while GTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


BRAGX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.48%
6M
10.15%
YTD
11.01%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
10.39%
ALL TIME*
11.64%

GTSGX

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.42%
6M
3.89%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.24%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRAGX
Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 Fund
11.01%18.09%35.79%23.13%-22.41%10.96%14.35%21.86%-22.42%18.44%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
7.83%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BRAGX and GTSGX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 1994

0.77

The correlation between BRAGX and GTSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRAGX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRAGX
BRAGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BRAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BRAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 Fund (BRAGX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRAGXGTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.11

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.72

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

1.72

+7.24

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRAGX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRAGX drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRAGX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRAGXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-73.82%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-11.99%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-19.63%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-21.94%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.74%

-38.25%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-0.69%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-29.57%

+13.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

5.05%

-2.91%

Volatility

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 Fund (BRAGX) is 3.69%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that BRAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRAGXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.00%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

10.47%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

14.71%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

17.48%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

18.07%

+3.25%

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRAGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRAGX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

BRAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.23%, more than GTSGX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRAGX
Bridgeway Aggressive Investors 1 Fund
29.23%18.90%3.19%0.88%1.46%1.18%1.01%1.30%11.62%0.00%0.56%0.05%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.12%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRAGX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to BRAGX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRAGX dropped -67.04% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

BRAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRAGX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer