PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRACX vs. JMABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRACX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRACX achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than JMABX's -0.07% return.


BRACX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.67%
6M
-1.20%
YTD
-0.87%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
1.87%
ALL TIME*
1.37%

JMABX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRACX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BRACX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio
-0.87%7.97%1.02%8.05%-15.97%-1.94%11.21%4.31%
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
-0.07%8.88%4.42%8.05%-15.50%0.33%7.74%2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BRACX and JMABX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019

0.93

The correlation between BRACX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRACX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRACX
BRACX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BRACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BRACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRACX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

JMABX
JMABX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JMABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMABX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JMABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMABX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRACX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRACXJMABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.45

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

4.71

-1.81

BRACX vs. JMABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the JMABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRACX and JMABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRACX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRACX drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, roughly equal to the maximum JMABX drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRACX and JMABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRACXJMABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-21.48%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.89%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-5.27%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.41%

-21.43%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-1.53%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-6.07%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.89%

+0.23%

Volatility

BRACX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 0.84%. This indicates that BRACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRACXJMABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.84%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

2.69%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

3.50%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

5.51%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

5.83%

+0.11%

BRACX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRACX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRACX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison

BRACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than JMABX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRACX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio
4.90%5.29%3.95%3.09%2.63%3.46%6.38%4.15%3.67%2.85%0.20%0.86%
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
5.21%5.59%5.26%3.59%3.28%3.99%2.74%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BRACX and JMABX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRACX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to JMABX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRACX dropped -22.49% vs JMABX's -21.48%.

JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRACX and JMABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer