BRACX vs. SIDCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BRACX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio) and SIDCX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, BRACX returned 2.25%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for SIDCX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BRACX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for SIDCX.

Performance

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BRACX having a 0.73% return and SIDCX slightly lower at 0.71%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRACX having a 2.25% annualized return and SIDCX not far ahead at 2.28%.

BRACX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 6.55%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 0.27%
• 10Y*: 2.25%

SIDCX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: 2.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRACX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio	0.73%	7.97%	1.02%	8.05%	-15.97%	-1.94%	11.21%	14.28%	-2.44%	5.11%
SIDCX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund	0.71%	7.40%	1.92%	6.58%	-15.78%	-1.66%	10.68%	12.43%	-1.61%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BRACX and SIDCX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2015	0.96

The correlation between BRACX and SIDCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BRACX vs. SIDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRACX

BRACX Risk / Return Rank: 30
BRACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BRACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BRACX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BRACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BRACX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SIDCX

SIDCX Risk / Return Rank: 26
SIDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SIDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SIDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SIDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SIDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRACX	SIDCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.43	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.14	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	1.97	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	6.23	+0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SIDCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRACX and SIDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRACX	SIDCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.43	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.02	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.40	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.41	-0.15

Drawdowns

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRACX drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SIDCX drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRACX and SIDCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRACX	SIDCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.49%	-21.47%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-3.10%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.79%	-6.38%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.41%	-21.39%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.49%	-21.47%	-1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-2.69%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-5.22%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	0.98%	0.00%

Volatility

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio (BRACX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRACX	SIDCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	1.52%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	3.17%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.29%	4.29%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.64%	6.42%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.94%	5.70%	+0.24%

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRACX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SIDCX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRACX vs. SIDCX - Dividend Comparison

BRACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than SIDCX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRACX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series C Portfolio	5.27%	5.29%	3.95%	3.09%	2.63%	3.46%	6.38%	4.15%	3.67%	2.85%	0.20%	0.86%
SIDCX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund	4.70%	4.61%	4.20%	2.99%	2.36%	3.57%	4.93%	3.07%	3.16%	2.77%	2.75%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRACX and SIDCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, BRACX and SIDCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BRACX or SIDCX?

SIDCX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to BRACX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRACX dropped -22.49% vs SIDCX's -21.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.