PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BQMGX vs. KMKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BQMGX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than KMKNX's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BQMGX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.85% annualized return.


BQMGX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
-2.98%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
8.77%

KMKNX

1D
3.45%
1M
-6.02%
YTD
14.60%
6M
10.65%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
34.33%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
19.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
-3.06%-0.29%14.16%13.00%-19.44%23.02%19.62%32.05%-6.68%22.16%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
14.60%-3.09%84.05%-7.34%14.98%28.03%19.56%22.76%-10.68%47.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BQMGX and KMKNX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.56

The correlation between BQMGX and KMKNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BQMGX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BQMGX
BQMGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BQMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BQMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BQMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BQMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BQMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KMKNX
KMKNX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KMKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KMKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BQMGXKMKNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.04

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

0.16

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

0.38

-1.04

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BQMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the KMKNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BQMGX and KMKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BQMGXKMKNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

0.11

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.60

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.84

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Drawdowns

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BQMGX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BQMGX and KMKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BQMGXKMKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-65.47%

+29.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-16.99%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-28.27%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-31.47%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-31.47%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-15.96%

+7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-15.28%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

6.94%

-2.04%

Volatility

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) is 3.38%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that BQMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BQMGXKMKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

6.46%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

19.52%

-10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

23.37%

-11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

26.43%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

23.65%

-5.67%

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BQMGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BQMGX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison

BQMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than KMKNX's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.25%4.12%5.99%0.00%5.90%8.05%5.27%3.50%0.00%0.08%1.07%5.80%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
0.58%0.66%0.81%0.87%1.36%1.56%0.26%0.33%9.13%0.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BQMGX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMKNX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to BQMGX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BQMGX dropped -36.05% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.

KMKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BQMGX and KMKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer