BQLCX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BQLCX (Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BQLCX returned 9.97%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BQLCX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BQLCX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BQLCX has underperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.

BQLCX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.45%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BQLCX Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund	1.76%	9.54%	6.70%	20.96%	-10.58%	27.60%	9.54%	29.95%	-5.58%	16.33%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	12.01%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BQLCX and MUHLX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between BQLCX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BQLCX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BQLCX

BQLCX Risk / Return Rank: 20
BQLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BQLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BQLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BQLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BQLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 40
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BQLCX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.77	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.41	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	2.41	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.78	9.09	-3.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BQLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BQLCX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BQLCX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.77	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.73	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.63	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.52	+0.18

Drawdowns

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BQLCX drawdown since its inception was -34.47%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BQLCX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BQLCX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.47%	-62.05%	+27.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.56%	-10.23%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.25%	-18.63%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.25%	-18.63%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.47%	-40.85%	+6.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-3.14%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-10.77%	+7.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.71%	-0.71%

Volatility

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 3.08% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BQLCX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.22%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.22%	10.97%	-3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.61%	13.98%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.07%	14.62%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	17.04%	-0.23%

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BQLCX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

BQLCX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

BQLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than MUHLX's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BQLCX Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund	7.66%	7.75%	0.92%	2.88%	15.70%	8.41%	3.51%	5.05%	5.11%	2.71%	3.59%	3.26%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	2.98%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BQLCX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

BQLCX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BQLCX or MUHLX?

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to BQLCX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BQLCX dropped -34.47% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.