PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPTRX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPTRX achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 30.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BPTRX having a 23.95% annualized return and CTCAX not far ahead at 24.65%.


BPTRX

1D
-0.98%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
18.45%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
23.95%

CTCAX

1D
-0.81%
1M
14.21%
YTD
30.99%
6M
29.92%
1Y
59.47%
3Y*
35.71%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
24.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
-1.17%24.54%32.75%43.09%-42.53%31.35%148.81%44.99%-2.01%31.54%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
30.99%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BPTRX and CTCAX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2002

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between BPTRX and CTCAX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPTRX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPTRXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

4.21

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

15.74

-8.77

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTRX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPTRXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.89

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.79

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.00

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.77

-0.22

Drawdowns

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTRX drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTRX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPTRXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-61.04%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-14.43%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.34%

-26.67%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-39.55%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-39.55%

-11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-0.81%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-10.68%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.86%

+0.56%

Volatility

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) is 3.59%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that BPTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPTRXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

6.55%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

16.74%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.59%

21.07%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.61%

25.98%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

24.84%

+7.85%

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPTRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPTRX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

BPTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than CTCAX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.40%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.51%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPTRX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to BPTRX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPTRX dropped -64.11% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPTRX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer