BPTIX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BPTIX (Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BPTIX returned 25.65%/yr vs 24.85%/yr for FCGSX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPTIX charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPTIX achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 19.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BPTIX having a 25.65% annualized return and FCGSX not far behind at 24.85%.

BPTIX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 6.43%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 38.44%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: 25.65%

FCGSX

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: 19.52%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 47.31%
• 3Y*: 32.25%
• 5Y*: 17.39%
• 10Y*: 24.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPTIX Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class	4.81%	24.86%	33.09%	43.47%	-42.39%	31.69%	149.45%	47.29%	-1.75%	31.91%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	19.52%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BPTIX and FCGSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between BPTIX and FCGSX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BPTIX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTIX

BPTIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
BPTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BPTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BPTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BPTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BPTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPTIX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.63	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.30	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	4.79	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.56	20.78	-12.23

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTIX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTIX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTIX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPTIX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.26%	-38.77%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-10.42%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.29%	-26.07%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.72%	-38.77%	-10.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.26%	-38.77%	-12.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.13%	-4.01%	-7.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-6.94%	-3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	2.40%	+2.06%

Volatility

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class (BPTIX) has a higher volatility of 13.64% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 7.87%. This indicates that BPTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPTIX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.64%	7.87%	+5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.52%	14.92%	+2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.80%	19.03%	+10.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.09%	23.87%	+10.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.91%	23.32%	+9.59%

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPTIX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPTIX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

BPTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than FCGSX's 8.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPTIX Baron Partners Fund Institutional Class	3.06%	3.21%	0.73%	0.00%	3.07%	7.46%	3.57%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.77%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPTIX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

BPTIX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPTIX or FCGSX?

BPTIX has higher volatility (13.64%) compared to FCGSX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPTIX dropped -51.26% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.