PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPRLX vs. HRSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPRLX achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than HRSTX's 6.14% return.


BPRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.67%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.70%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*

HRSTX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.95%
YTD
6.14%
6M
6.27%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
5.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
5.08%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
6.14%3.66%3.23%5.06%5.90%3.95%2.65%8.35%9.66%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BPRLX and HRSTX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017

0.19

Over the past year, BPRLX and HRSTX have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPRLX vs. HRSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HRSTX
HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPRLXHRSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.83

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.46

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.03

24.51

-4.48

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the HRSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPRLX and HRSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPRLXHRSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.40

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.56

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.03

+0.68

Drawdowns

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPRLX drawdown since its inception was -24.28%, smaller than the maximum HRSTX drawdown of -69.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPRLX and HRSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPRLXHRSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.28%

-69.69%

+45.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-2.42%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-2.42%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-2.42%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.55%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-31.59%

+27.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.34%

+0.34%

Volatility

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) is 0.69%, while Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that BPRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPRLXHRSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.37%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

3.40%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14%

3.49%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

3.33%

+12.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

7.16%

+7.90%

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPRLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSTX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPRLX vs. HRSTX - Dividend Comparison

BPRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than HRSTX's 8.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.94%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%0.00%0.00%
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
8.92%6.72%4.47%5.60%2.24%3.75%2.10%3.36%1.33%5.55%13.80%4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPRLX and HRSTX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSTX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to BPRLX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPRLX dropped -24.28% vs HRSTX's -69.69%.

BPRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPRLX and HRSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer