BPH vs. VGSH
BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while VGSH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. BPH is actively managed, while VGSH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.
Performance
BPH vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BPH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
BPH vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -3.53% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPH and VGSH is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPH vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGSH
BPH vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPH | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPH vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPH | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -5.70% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | 0.00% | -6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -0.59% | -6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
BPH vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPH | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.00% | 1.33% | +26.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.00% | 1.98% | +26.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.00% | 1.58% | +26.42% |
BPH vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BPH vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VGSH's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.84% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPH and VGSH have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.
VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.52% for BPH.
BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while VGSH is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.03% for VGSH.
Find the right allocation for BPH and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer